Gibson & Epiphone Guitar Forum
Registered Member Login:
Not a member? Register today!



Welcome to the Gibson & Epiphone Guitar Forum.

You're going to love it here. We've got Gibson & Epiphone forums, member galleries, classified ads, and more for you here.
You can read posts as a guest but posting here requires registration. But, don't worry, registering is quick, easy and painless. Why not register today?




View Single Post
Old February 26th, 2004, 02:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
Troels
Gibson Talker
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
Re: Oh, But I Do Disagree.........................

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmitt O.
................with you Troels. The sky was grey today, all day.

Seriously, though, I do believe the 135/335 debate between us could go on forever. I have owned both and I feel they can be compared.

Sorry for the mahagony/maple error, I'm surprised you found only the one mistake. Also, balsa is cheap wood and not very useful. That's why they put it in the 135: it's cheap and so is that guitar. Hardwoods are much more expensive.

Anyway, tomaaaato, tomato, who knows. Perhaps we'll never agree on this issue. How do you feel about politics? Right, better not go there either.

Take care.
Emmitt
I did find three... actually... as the sky was blue I do agree with you that Balsa should not be found in a guitar... And still: You take two semis - one with balsa block one - with maple - one being deep bodied (medium) the other one being thin bodied - one with a double cut away rounded - the other with single pointed - one with stop tail piece - one with trapeze - and then you tell me .. come on Emmitt .... ouhhhh politics - If I lived in the USA I would be a left wing democrat... fighting for human rights and subjects like that ... troels
Troels is offline Offline   Reply With Quote
 

» Gibson-Talk Photos
MY LES PAUL STUDIO
JD082570
MY LES PAUL STUDIO
» Sponsored Links
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2